Eye Disorders and Neuro-ophthalmic Manifestations of COVID-19

Growing data are confirming the association between the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and eye disorders, including ocular alterations and neuro-ophthalmic manifestations. The main pathophysiological mechanisms considered included a direct infection through the ocular surface, a post-viremia secretion of the virus from the lacrimal glands, and a viral dissemination through the bloodstream. According to the different ways of contagion, different structures could be involved.The most common ocular symptoms reported in COVID-19 patients were dry eye, redness, tearing, itching and pain. Among symptomatic patients, most of them presented conjunctivitis. Considering the posterior chamber, retinal artery and vein occlusions were described in few clinical reports;moreover, some studies presented cases of paracentral acute middle maculopathy occurring in COVID-19 patients. The involvement of the choroid seems to be rare, and a single case of atypical choroiditis was currently described. Between neuro-ophthalmic manifestations, optic neuritis appear to be relatively frequent and generally not associated with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. Some reports showed the involvement of the ocular motor nerves, often presenting with palsy. Miller Fisher syndrome has been showed in rare cases;however, this association could be corroborated by the several reports describing Guillain-Barré syndrome occurrence in COVID-19 patients.In line with well-known previous viral infection, COVID-19 seems to be associated with eye involvement. Thus, ocular and neuro-ophthalmic symptoms and signs should be carefully assessed and monitored in these patients. To reach this purpose, it is critical to implement remote diagnostic techniques. Moreover, the comprehension of the pathogenetic mechanisms is still scarce and no standardized diagnostic protocol was established for these patients, making necessary further studies to improve current understandings. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Prognostic modelling of number of patients with retinal vein occlusion in anti-VEGF therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate temporal changes in age- and sex-stratified incidence rates of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) commenced in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment, proportion of patients remaining in active anti-VEGF therapy over time, and to develop a forecasting model for future number of patients with RVO in active anti-VEGF therapy. METHODS: This was a registry-based study of patients with RVO in the Capital Region of Denmark from commenced in anti-VEGF therapy from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2022. Census data were extracted from Statistics Denmark for incidence rate analyses and forecasting data of future demographics. RESULTS: A total of 2641 patients with RVO were commenced in anti-VEGF therapy, of which 2192 were later discontinued. Number of patients rose dramatically during the first years of introduction of anti-VEGF therapy, after which growth was slower and followed the demographic changes. Trend analyses revealed that the COVID-19 epidemics impacted with fewer referrals and more aggressive discontinuation practices. Annual incidence of RVO in 2012-2021 was 13.1 per 100 000 (95% CI: 12.6-13.6 per 100 000). Proportion of patients with RVO remaining in active anti-VEGF treatment was 55.0%, 40.1%, 30.8% and 12.1% after Years 1, 2, 3 and 8, respectively. According to our forecast, number of patients with RVO in active anti-VEGF therapy will grow slowly but continually at least until year 2035. CONCLUSION: Our study reports incidence rates and provides prognostic modelling of number of patients with RVO in anti-VEGF therapy.

Ocular Adverse Events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA Vaccination: Matched Cohort and Self-Controlled Case Series Studies Using a Large Database.

PURPOSE: To investigate the risk of ocular adverse events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. DESIGN: Matched cohort and self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies. PARTICIPANTS: We used a population-based database of medical claims and vaccination records in a large Japanese city. In the matched cohort study, we identified individuals who received COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2) from February 2021 to September 2021. One control was selected from nonvaccinated individuals by matching time, date of birth, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the enrollment period for health insurance. In the SCCS study, we analyzed individuals who developed ocular adverse events. METHODS: In the matched cohort study, we applied the Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate the cumulative incidence of ocular adverse events over 21 days after the first dose and 84 days after the second dose. In the SCCS method, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ocular adverse events during the risk periods (0-21 days after the first dose and 0-84 days after the second dose) compared with the remaining periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite outcome of uveitis, scleritis, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and optic neuritis. RESULTS: There were 99 718 pairs eligible for the matched cohort study after the first dose (mean age, 69.3 years; male, 44%). The vaccinated and control groups developed 29 and 21 events, respectively, over 21 days after the first dose, and 79 and 28 events, respectively, over 84 days after the second dose. The differences in cumulative incidence (reference, the control group) were 2.9 (95% confidence interval, -14.5 to 19.1) events/100 000 persons and 51.3 (16.2-84.3) events/100 000 persons, respectively, for the first and second doses. The SCCS study showed the IRRs of 0.89 (0.62-1.28) and 0.89 (0.71-1.11) for the first and second doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The matched cohort analysis found an increased risk for the composite outcome after the second dose; however, the SCCS analysis showed no increased risk. Considering that the SCCS can cancel out time-invariant confounders, the current results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to causally increase the risk of ocular adverse events. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion After COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report.

A 65-year-old male patient presented to the ED complaining of blurred vision in the left eye for the last three days. The patient had just recovered from COVID-19 infection and had a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test two days after the initiation of symptoms. His family and medical history were clear. Ophthalmological examination and imaging revealed branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema in the left eye, while the right eye was normal. The visual acuity was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/36 in the left eye. Laboratory tests, as well as the full cardiovascular and thrombophilia evaluation, were normal. Since the patient did not have known risk factors for BRVO, we hypothesize that it was related to COVID-19 infection. However, the causality between the two entities remains under investigation.

Analyze of factors and prognosis of eyes lost to follow-up in retinal vein occlusive disease patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) who received at least one intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (VEGF) and lost to follow-up (LTFU) for more than six months were analyzed to investigate the factors contributing to the LTFU and the prognosis. METHOD: This was a retrospective, single-center study to analyze the causes and prognosis of LTFU over six months in RVO-ME patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at our institution from January 2019 to August 2022 and to collect patients' baseline characteristics along with the number of injections before LTFU, primary disease, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before LTFU and after return visit, central macular thickness (CMT), months before LTFU and after LTFU, reasons for LTFU, and complications, to analyze the factors affecting visual outcome at a return visit. RESULTS: This study included 125 patients with LTFU; 103 remained LTFU after six months, and 22 returned after LTFU. The common reason for LTFU was "no improvement in vision" (34.4%), followed by "transport inconvenience" (22.4%), 16 patients (12.8%) were unwilling to visit the clinic, 15 patients (12.0%) had already elected to seek treatment elsewhere, 12 patients (9.6%) were not seen in time due to the 2019-nCov epidemic, and 11 patients (8.8%) cannot do it due to financial reasons. The number of injections before LTFU was a risk factor for LTFU (P < 0.05). LogMAR at the initial visit (P < 0.001), CMT at the initial visit (P < 0.05), CMT before the LTFU (P < 0.001), and CMT after the return visit (P < 0.05) were influential factors for logMAR at the return visit. CONCLUSION: Most RVO-ME patients were LTFU after anti-VEGF therapy. Long-term LTFU is greatly detrimental to the visual quality of patients; thus, the management of RVO-ME patients in follow-up should be considered.

Check Point SOS! A Case of Cemiplimab-Associated Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome

Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a clinical syndrome characterized by hepatomegaly, right-upper quadrant pain, and ascites that occurs most commonly in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The diagnosis can be confirmed on biopsy. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. There are currently no known reports of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related VOD/SOS. Case Description/Methods: A 58-year-old female with a history of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the left eye treated with six months of Cemipilimab presented with ascites. On admission, labs were notable for a total bilirubin of 1.2, mildly elevated liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase 884, and international normalized ratio 2.1. A diagnostic tap revealed a high SAAG ascites that was negative for infection. A comprehensive serological workup for viral, metabolic and autoimmune causes was unrevealing. A transjugular liver biopsy demonstrated a hepatic venous pressure gradient of 18mmHg, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and portal venopathy. The patient was discharged on steroids but returned one month later for recurrent ascites and worsening bilirubin to 12.6 (direct 7.3);COVID PCR was negative. A full rheumatologic and vasculitis workup was unremarkable. Repeat biopsy (Figure 1) demonstrated moderate NRH changes, prominent central vein sclerosis with fibrous obliteration, signs of SOS/ VOD and central venulitis with fibrotic changes with sinusoidal portal hypertension. Discussion(s): VOD occurs most often with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and chemotherapeutic agents. Here we present the first case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced VOD/SOS. Despite discontinuation of the offending agent and a trial of steroids, the patient's clinical course continued to deteriorate. She eventually developed refractory ascites and portosystemic encephalopathy. She was deemed not a candidate for liver transplant given her underlying malignancy. She was transitioned to home hospice before further treatment, such as Defibrotide could have been pursued. VOD associated with immune checkpoint inhibition should be considered in the differential of patients who develop new onset liver dysfunction and ascites while receiving these medications (Figure Presented).

Case of acute vision loss after injectable remdesivir with anticoagulants and overdose of antibiotics: A late report.

A woman reported decreased vision in the right eye since hospitalization for COVID-19. Vision in the right eye was 6/18 and in the left eye was counting fingers. Her left eye had cataract and right eye was pseudophakic with earlier documented good recovery. In the right eye, she had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema documented on optical coherence tomography (OCT). It was suspected that it might be an ocular manifestation of COVID-19 which had not been reported and had worsened. An overdose of antibiotics or remdesivir might also be responsible for the same. She was advised anti-VEGF injections and was kept under treatment.

Risk of Retinal Vascular Occlusion among Patients with Covid-19 and Influenza A: A Multi-Centered Analysis

Purpose of Study: Severe COVID-19 infection has been associated with a hypercoagulable state, contributing to the formation of clots. Retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) is a common cause of vision impairment and is due to blockage of the retinal arteries and veins. There have been reported cases of patients with previous history of COVID-19 presenting with new RVO. Given the minimal research delving into this relationship, the purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term prevalence and risk for RVO following infection by COVID-19 compared to Influenza A. Methods Used: Two cohorts were created using TrinetX, a national federated electronic health record (EHR). The two cohorts consisted of patients with a history of COVID-19 (n=2,352,475) and patients with a history of Influenza A (n=67,065). Both cohorts were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) addressing demographics and medical comorbidities. Outcomes between the two cohorts were compared using adjusted risk ratios (aRR), with a confidence interval of 95%. Summary of Results: After PSM, two cohorts of 67,063 patients each were compared. Patients in the COVID-19 cohort had an average age of 41.4+/-23.0 years compared to 34.4+/-27.7 years in the Influenza cohort. Between the two cohorts, there was no significant difference in risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion (aRR [95% CI] = 0.72 [0.49,1.06];p=0.097) and patients with COVID-19 had a significantly lower risk for developing retinal vein occlusion (aRR [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.27,0.77];p=0.03). Incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.1% between both cohorts. Retinal artery occlusion was excluded from analysis due to obfuscation of the data by the EHR. Conclusion(s): Between the two cohorts, there was no significant difference in risk for developing RVO within 120 days. However, while there was no significant difference, vascular occlusions were found at a relatively younger age than the general population. Although incidence of RVO was low between the two cohorts, both viruses could be considered a risk factor for development of RVO, particularly in younger patients lacking classic risk factors for the disease.

Retinal vein occlusion in the general population after COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is mostly a consequence of vascular risk factors (VRF). COVID-19 vaccines have been related to vascular and thrombotic events (VTE). OBJECTIVE: To assess the RVO incidence in the general population in our health area and the possible relation with COVID-19 infection and vaccination. METHODS: Demographic features, classic VRF, thrombophilia data, COVID-19 status, and Framingham risk score were collected prospectively. RESULTS: 472 consecutive patients studied over 13 years with RVO were included (Valdecilla Cohort). Classic VRFs were present in 90%, antiphospholipid syndrome in 12.3%, and genetic thrombophilia in 13.5%. Ninety-one percent of RVO patients were vaccinated and 6.8% suffered COVID-19 infection. In the cohort, no patient had a new RVO after vaccination or infection. In the general population, 20 subjects had RVO after receiving the vaccine (0.006%). Overall, 8 cases occurred in the first-month post-vaccination and 12 after 30 days. In the early and late groups, there are 3 and 4 patients respectively, with a low-intermediate risk Framingham score. Twenty-nine patients in the cohort suffered SARS-CoV-2 infection, twenty-seven of them had RVO before infection. Two patients with low-risk Framingham scores had RVO after infection, one of them early (<1 month). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination and COVID-19 might be involved in the development of RVO in some cases, mainly in patients without VRF, thrombophilia, or chronic inflammatory conditions and with a lower Framingham score, especially in the first month after vaccination or infection.

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Occurring After 2nd Dose of Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Report

An old-aged woman was evaluated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) vision reduction in his left eye three weeks after the Sinopharm coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1m counting finger in the left eye and 10/10 in the right eye. Initial retinal findings were superior retinal hemorrhage with prominent retinal vein dilation and tortuosity in the left eye. Fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed a BRVO diagnosis. Blood reports showed no abnormalities. Antithrombotic treatment of 80 mg/d low-dose entrocoated ASA was administered. In addition, an intravitreal Aflibercept (Eylea) injection, monthly and ongoing, was prescripted, which led to a decrease in macular edema, retinal hemorrhage, and height of serous retinal detachment. Moreover, the BCVA improved to 2/10 after a three-week follow-up.Copyright © 2023, Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.

Full-Thickness Macular Hole After Intravitreal Conbercept Injection in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

This article reports a case of macular hole (MH) formation following intravitreal conbercept injection for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). A 70-year-old male received three consecutive intravitreal injections of conbercept for the treatment of macular edema secondary to BRVO in his left eye. Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic, the patient was lost to follow-up. At two months follow-up, a full-thickness MH was detected by fundoscopic and optical coherence tomography examination. Fortunately, the MH was successfully closed after pars plana vitrectomy. MH is a rare complication following intravitreal injections for RVO, which should be considered by clinicians.

Bilateral Simultaneous Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Secondary to COVID-19: A Case Report.

Herein, we report a case of bilateral simultaneous central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) secondary to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A 48-year-old man, with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and stage 4 chronic kidney disease, diagnosed with COVID-19 1 month ago presented to the ophthalmology department with blurred vision in both eyes for 2 weeks. Ocular examination revealed a classic clinical presentation of CRVO in both eyes. Optical coherence tomography revealed increased central macular thickness with intraretinal and subretinal fluid in both eyes. Laboratory data revealed elevated D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The levels of other hypercoagulability markers were normal. The patient received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in both eyes, followed by regular follow-up every month until complete resolution of symptoms and gradual improvement of the retinal vascular appearance. COVID-19 can cause a variety of coagulation abnormalities and thromboembolic complications such as bilateral simultaneous CRVO. Clinicians and patients should be aware of ocular symptoms and presentations that are probably associated with COVID-19.

Retinal Vein Occlusion with COVID-19: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a case report of Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) with COVID-19 infection. CASE: A 15-year-old healthy male presented with blurring of vision, 2+ vitreous cells, retinal haemorrhages and dilated and tortuous retinal vessels in the left eye within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. He was diagnosed with left non-ischaemic CRVO, with a suspected aetiology of COVID-19. DISCUSSION: A literature review found 12 reported cases of RVO associated with COVID-19. All but one patient was younger than 60, with a mean age of 42 years. Management varied, but in the majority (8/12), visual acuity (VA) improved with follow-up, and five (42%) had a final VA of 20/20. CONCLUSION: In the absence of other known aetiological factors, ophthalmologists should consider COVID-19 as a cause of RVO. The outcome can vary, but the majority can expect improvement in VA with time.

Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Syndrome Associated with Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia may predispose to thromboembolic disease, including after the acute phase. We report on a unique case of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) occurring eight months after diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in a likely case of post-COVID-19 syndrome. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man developed blurred vision in his right eye eight months after symptoms of pneumonia. He had no underlying medical conditions, but experienced exertional chest pain since diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by detection of SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab and was also seeing cardiology for management of myocarditis. His best-corrected visual acuity on snellen chart testing was reduced to 6/18 in the affected right eye, and dilated fundal examination revealed a non-ischaemic CRVO. CONCLUSION: The thromboembolic complications of COVID-19 may extend to CRVO, which in this case presented months after onset of symptoms of pneumonia, in association with myocarditis.

Retinal vascular occlusions in COVID-19 infection and vaccination: a literature review.

PURPOSE: Abnormal hypercoagulability and increased thromboembolic risk are common in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). COVID-19 has been suggested to cause retinal vascular damage, with several studies on COVID-19 patients with retinal vascular occlusions. We reviewed and investigated studies on retinal vascular occlusions in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and in those vaccinated for COVID-19. METHODS: Studies that reported retinal vascular occlusion in COVID-19 patients or in vaccinated people were identified using the terms "retinal occlusion," together with "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2", "SARS-CoV-2," "COVID-19," "coronavirus," and "vaccine," through systematic searches of PubMed and Google Scholar databases until January 7, 2022. RESULTS: Thirteen cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and 14 cases of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) were identified among patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Half of the patients with RAO or RVO revealed no systemic disorders except current or past COVID-19, and ocular symptoms were the initial presentation in five cases. Among patients with RAO, most presented with central RAO at 1-14 days of COVID-19 diagnosis, with abnormal coagulation and inflammatory markers. Among those with RVO, two-thirds presented with central RVO and one-third with RVO. Eleven cases with acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) and/or paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) were reported among patients with COVID-19, presenting scotoma resolved spontaneously in most cases. Among the 26 cases vaccinated with either mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccines for COVID-19 and presenting retinal vascular occlusions, there were more RVO cases than RAO cases, and ocular symptoms mostly occurred within 3 weeks after vaccination. One case presented bilateral AMN and PAMM after COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: Retinal vascular occlusions might be a manifestation of COVID-19, although rare, especially in patients at risk of systemic hypercoagulability and thromboembolism. For COVID-19 vaccines, the causal relationship is controversial because there are few case reports of retinal vascular occlusions after COVID-19 vaccination.

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions as a Serious Complication of Covid 19 Infection

BACKGROUND: Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) has an incidence of 0.5-1.2%. COVID-19 is associated with both venous and arterial thromboembolisms due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilization, and diffuse intravascular coagulation. AIM: The present study aims to describe our experience with BRVO in Egyptian COVID-19 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present retrospective study included 17 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-proven COVID-19 patients with BRVO. Data obtained from the studied patients included detailed history taking. In addition, patients were diagnosed with BRVO based on a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, including logMAR Best-corrected visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp bio-microscopy, fundoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography macular assessment. RESULT(S): The present study included 17 PCR-proven COVID-19 patients with BRVO. They comprised 9 males (52.9%) and 8 females (47.1%) with an age of 52.8 +/- 13.3 years. Fundus examination revealed BRVO as superior temporal in 9 patients (52.9%), inferior temporal in 5 patients (29.4%), superior nasal in 2 patients (11.8%), and inferior nasal in 1 patient (5.9%). The reported retinal thickness was 355.7 +/- 41.7 microm. In addition, fundus fluorescein angiography identified ischemic changes in 2 patients (11.8%). CONCLUSION(S): BRVO is a rare severe complication of COVID-19 infection. In patients with proven or suspected infection with a diminution of vision, there should be high suspicion of BRVO and prompt full-scale ophthalmological examination to exclude the condition. Copyright © 2022 Sanaa Ahmed Mohamed, Marwa Byomy, Eman El Sayed Mohamed El Sayed, Mostafa Osman Hussein, Marwa M. Abdulrehim, Ahmed Gomaa Elmahdy.

Bilateral Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion after mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 Booster Dose Vaccination.

PURPOSE: We report a case of a patient with a bilateral branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) 24 h after a booster vaccination with the mRNA-1237 vaccine. OBSERVATIONS: Fluorescein angiography, performed at three weeks follow-up, showed vascular leakage and blockage, corresponding to hemorrhage areas associated with ischemic areas in the macula and along the arcades involved in the occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The patient was scheduled for urgent injections of intravitreal ranibizumab and laser photocoagulation of the ischemic areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case described of concomitant bilateral RVO after COVID-19 vaccination. The rapid onset of the side effects in a patient with multiple risk factors for thrombotic events suggests that vulnerable microvascular conditions require detailed investigations before administration of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Young Woman with Diabetes and Hypertension after mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination-A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature.

A 25-year-old female with diabetes and hypertension presented with progressive painless blurred vision in her left eye ten days after she received her third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). The clinical examination confirmed the diagnosis of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) complicated with macular edema. Three doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were injected intravitreally. Visual acuity was improved from 20/100 to 20/30, but recurrence was noted at 6 months. Several cases of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. However, the present case is the youngest female individual documented to have CRVO after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This case demonstrates that the macular edema might be recurrent in patients with risk factors for CRVO who receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, suggesting the need for careful consideration of the treatment strategy and close follow-up. Although the definite pathogenesis still needs to be carefully determined, this report highlights the possible association between RVO and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, even in young individuals.

Eyeing up the pandemic: A literature review of the ocular manifestations of COVID-19

Background Since the onset of SARS-CoV-2, this novel virus has been the focus of many studies seeking to improve the ability of healthcare systems to withstand pandemics against it. COVID-19 has pulmonary and cardiovascular implications, but its ocular effects remain a subject of debate. Objectives The objective of our narrative review is to explore the ophthalmic manifestations of COVID-19, identify research gaps, and act as a guide for further research in the field. Methods The literature search involved original studies published from January 1, 2020, up until August 20, 2021, on the PubMed database. Title and screening and full text review were conducted by two independent researchers, with a third researcher resolving conflicts. Studies that met the set inclusion criteria were used for data synthesis. Results The preliminary search generated 59 articles, with 25 being data extracted. Conjunctivitis, epiphora and ocular irritation were consistently stated anterior segment manifestations. Posterior segment implications were mostly subclinical, including cotton-wool spots and retinal nerve-fiber layer thinning, but some cases were more detrimental, such as central retinal vein occlusion, posterior segment inflammation, retinal hemorrhages, and fungal infiltration. RT-PCR tests were unreliable in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in ocular tissues, potentially due to methodological limitations. Conclusion Anterior segment findings were significant manifestations of the novel coronavirus, but a clear resolution of posterior segment findings is yet to be made. In the absence of reliable COVID-19 ocular sample tests, all links made to SARS-CoV-2 etiology remain tentative;further research must be directed to the field with modified testing strategies. Copyright © 2022 University of Jordan,Deanship of Scientific Research. All rights reserved.

Central retinal vein occlusion post ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination - can it be explained by the two-hit hypothesis?

PURPOSE: To report a case of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) seven days following the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and propose a hypothesis for the possible underlying pathogenesis. OBSERVATION: A 31-year-old male presented with CRVO with cystoid macular edema, one week after receiving his first ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine dose. Apart from mild hyperhomocysteinemia, no major thrombophilic or systemic risk factors were found. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies, specific for vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, were also negative. However, he tested strongly positive (> 250 U/mL) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG spike antibodies, 2 weeks post the first dose - suggestive of a prior subclinical infection. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is known to be associated with an altered host one-carbon metabolism resulting in hyperhomocysteinemia. We hypothesize that a prior subclinical infection with COVID-19, the first hit, may have led to hyperhomocysteinemia in our patient and vaccination must have been the second hit that triggered the thrombotic event. Further studies, including correlation of thrombotic complications with IgG antibody titres post-vaccination, are essential in order to better understand the pathogenesis of such events.